Wednesday, September 4, 2019
A Pentadic Analysis of Two Pleas for Christian Unity :: Religion Christians Christianity Burke Papers
A Pentadic Analysis of Two Pleas for Christian Unity       Introduction          The prayer for Christian unity began with Christ, himself (John 1:21), and  continues today. This essay proposes to examine two pleas for Christian  unity using the rhetorical theory of Kenneth Burke. According to Em  Griffin, "Kenneth Burke was the foremost rhetorician of the twentieth  century. Burke wrote about rhetoric; other rhetoricians write about Burke"  (319).    Burke's theory seems especially relevant to the study of pleas for unity  because of his focus on identification. For Burke, rhetoric is  identification. "You persuade a man only insofar as you can talk his  language by speech, gesture, tonality, order, image, attitude, idea,  identifying your ways with his" (Rhetoric 55). Additionally, Burke  equates identification with consubstantiality. "To identify A with B is to  make A 'consubstantial' with B" (Rhetoric 21).     The two calls for Christian unity to be analyzed are Thomas Campbell's  "Declaration and Address" and E. Glenn Wagner's The Awesome Power of  Shared Beliefs. Campbell's address is important because of its historical  significance. "This document, which calls for Christian unity through a  return to the clear and unambiguous teachings of the New Testament, in  many ways chartered the course for the movement the Campbells led" (Hughes  11). Wagner's book is chosen because of the contemporary prominence of the  Promise Keepers movement.    This essay will proceed by explaining relevant aspects of Kenneth Burke's  works, including the methodology to be used, applying the methodology to  the two pleas, and discussing the results.    Dramatism and the Pentad     Burke saw life as a drama played out in our language. By examining the  words of a person, you can determine his or her motives. Motives are  grammatical creations which explain "what people are doing and why they  are doing it" (Grammar x). Foss provides the following explanation:  We use rhetoric to constitute and present a particular view of  our situation, just as the presentation of a play creates a  certain world or situation inhabited by characters who engage  in actions in a setting. Through rhetoric, we size up situations  and name their structures and outstanding ingredients. How we  describe a situation indicates how we are perceiving it, the  choices we see available to us, and the action we are likely to  take in our situation. (456)    The pentad is a the tool used to investigate motives. Burke writes, ". . .   any complete statement about motives will offer some kind of answer to  these five questions: what was done (act), when or where it was done  (scene), who did it (agent), how he did it (agency), and why (purpose)"  (Grammar x).  					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.